Listen: https://soundcloud.com/astrophiz/astrophiz218-dr-nancy-grace
VALE: Nancy Grace Roman ~ 16 May 1925 ~ 25 December 2018
Full Transcript:
Welcome back to Astrophiz, the podcast where we explore the cosmos and the brilliant minds that help us understand it. I’m your host, Brendan O’Brien, and today we’re taking a journey through the life and achievements of a truly remarkable astronomer who quite literally changed how we see the universe.
Today we’re meeting Nancy Grace Roman, who spent over 30 years fighting, and winning, to give humanity the greatest space telescope ever built.
She’s the woman who literally changed how we see the universe. Let’s dive in!
Her name is Nancy Grace Roman, though she’s probably better known by a title that would make any scientist proud: the Mother of Hubble.
Now, before you start thinking this is going to be a dry recitation of scientific accomplishments, let me tell you—Nancy Grace Roman’s story is both astonishing and inspiring.
First up, her preferred name is indeed a double-barrelled one … Nancy Grace … for she was a southerner where double names are ubiquitous ….
This is the tale of a woman who, as an 11-year-old, organized astronomy clubs in her backyard, grew up to become NASA’s first Chief of Astronomy, and then spent decades fighting bureaucracy, skeptical scientists, and congressional budget committees to give humanity one of its greatest gifts: the Hubble Space Telescope.
Chapter 1: The Girl Who Wouldn’t Take No for an Answer
Nancy Grace Roman was born on May 16, 1925, in Nashville, Tennessee, to Irwin Roman, a geophysicist, and Georgia Smith Roman, a music teacher. From the very beginning, it was clear that Nancy Grace had inherited her father’s love of science and her mother’s determination—a combination that would prove absolutely unstoppable.
Picture this: it’s the 1930s, and while many 11-year-old girls are playing with dolls, Nancy Grace is organizing astronomy clubs for her neighborhood friends. She’d gather kids in her backyard, armed with star charts and an infectious enthusiasm for the night sky.
Her friends probably thought they were just playing games, but Nancy Grace was already displaying the leadership skills that would one day convince an entire space agency to bet billions of dollars on her vision.
The family moved frequently due to her father’s work—Nevada, New Mexico, Maryland, and finally Michigan.
Each move might have disrupted another child’s education, but Nancy Grace saw it as an opportunity to observe different night skies. Just a year later, by age 12, she was already plotting her career path in astronomy.
Most kids that age can barely decide what they want for lunch, but Nancy Grace had her entire professional life mapped out like a constellation chart.
Here’s where the story gets both inspiring and infuriating. When Nancy Grace told her high school guidance counselor about her plans to study astronomy, the counselor’s response was essentially, “That’s adorable, dear, but have you considered being a teacher?”
This was the 1940s, when women in science were about as welcome as a solar flare at a satellite convention. But Nancy Grace had what we might diplomatically call a “strong personality.”
When faced with discouragement, she didn’t pivot—she doubled down. The war had just finished, and she enrolled at Swarthmore College in Philly in 1946, where she threw herself into physics and astronomy with the kind of intensity usually reserved for Olympic training.
Chapter 2: The Making of an Astronomer Swarthmore in the late 1940s was a progressive institution, but even there, Nancy Grace often found herself the only woman in her advanced physics classes. Imagine walking into a room full of young men. who think your presence is either a mistake or a joke, and then proceeding to outperform most of them.
That was an ordinary Tuesday for Nancy Grace Roman.
She graduated in 1946 with a bachelor’s degree in astronomy, but she was just getting started. She headed over to the University of Chicago for graduate work, where she dove into stellar spectroscopy—essentially, analyzing the light from stars to understand their composition and behavior.
It’s like being a cosmic detective, using light as evidence to solve mysteries that are literally astronomical. Her doctoral thesis focused on the analysis of stars in the Big Dipper …
She found more than 200 stars that had been born in the Ursa Major cluster and had migrated away.
Now, I know what you’re thinking—”That sounds incredibly technical and possibly mind-numbing.” But here’s the thing: Nancy Grace was essentially learning to read the universe’s fingerprints. Every star tells a story through its light, and Nancy Grace was becoming fluent in that cosmic language. Spectroscopy.
Her doctoral thesis also focused on the spectroscopic analysis of stars, particularly examining how stellar atmospheres absorb light at different wavelengths.
She earned her PhD in 1949 at age 24, and immediately faced the harsh realities of being a woman in astronomy.
Job opportunities were scarce, and many observatories had explicit policies against hiring women. The reasoning? Well, the polite version was that night-time observing wasn’t “suitable” for women.
The more accurate version involves a lot of assumptions about women’s capabilities and dedication that would make modern audiences’ eyes roll so hard they’d risk injury.
Well … Despite these obstacles, Nancy Grace landed a position at the University of Chicago’s Yerkes Observatory. She spent six years there, conducting research on stellar evolution and galactic structure.
But already she was growing frustrated with the limitations of ground-based astronomy. The atmosphere, while great for breathing, is terrible for getting clear views of space. It’s like trying to watch a movie through a swimming pool—technically possible, but definitely not optimal.
Chapter 3: NASA and the Birth of Space-Based Astronomy
In 1959, something happened that would change Nancy Grace’s life and, ultimately, humanity’s understanding of the universe. NASA, barely a year old and still figuring out how to spell “aerospace,” came calling on Nancy Grace Roman.
They wanted her to head up their new astronomy program. Now, you have to understand what NASA was like in 1959. It was the cosmic equivalent of a startup company—lots of ambition, lots of coffee, and a tendency to make things up as they went along.
The space race was heating up, and while everyone was focused on getting humans to the Moon, Nancy Grace saw a different opportunity: getting telescopes above the atmosphere.
She became NASA’s first Chief of Astronomy and Relativity, a title that sounds like it should come with a cape and possibly superpowers. In many ways, it did. Nancy Grace was now in a position to shape how humanity would explore the universe, and she had some very big ideas.
Her first major success was the Orbiting Astronomical Observatory program. These weren’t exactly the Instagram-worthy space telescopes we know today—they were more like flying filing cabinets with mirrors attached. But via her OAO program, Nancy Grace is credited with the first space telescope, and proved that space-based astronomy could work, and more importantly, she showed how much we were missing by observing only from Earth’s surface.
The OAO missions detected intense ultraviolet light from stars and galaxies, which radiation that Earth’s atmosphere blocks completely.
It was like suddenly being able to see ultraviolet colors after a lifetime of partial color blindness.
The universe was literally more colorful than we had ever imagined.
But Nancy Grace had an even bigger vision brewing. She was already thinking about what would eventually become the Hubble Space Telescope, though at the time, the idea of launching a 2.4-meter mirror into space seemed about as realistic as opening a Starbucks on Mars.
Chapter 4: The Hubble Wars Begin
By the early 1970s, Nancy Grace was deep in the fight of her professional life. She was trying to convince NASA, Congress, and the broader scientific community to fund something unprecedented: a large space telescope that would cost more than some small countries’ entire GDP.
The project that would become Hubble faced opposition from multiple fronts. Ground-based astronomers argued that new Earth-based telescopes would be just as good and much cheaper. Budget-conscious politicians questioned why they should spend billions on what some called “an expensive camera for taking pretty pictures of space.”
And even within NASA, there were debates about whether such an ambitious project was technically feasible. Nancy Grace found herself in the position of being part scientist, part lobbyist, part diplomat, and part fortune teller.
She had to explain complex astrophysics to politicians, justify enormous costs to taxpayers, and somehow convince everyone that the potential discoveries would be worth the investment.
Her approach was methodical and brilliant. She organized committees of prominent astronomers to define the telescope’s scientific objectives. She commissioned engineering studies to prove the project was technically feasible. She created detailed timelines and budgets, then defended them in congressional hearings where senators would ask questions like, “Why can’t you just use binoculars?”
The project survived multiple budget cuts, design changes, and political upheavals.
At one point, Congress actually cancelled the entire program, only to reinstate it after an intense lobbying campaign. Nancy Grace later joked that she spent more time in Washington conference rooms than she ever did looking through telescopes, but she understood that building Hubble required political engineering as much as optical engineering.
Chapter 5: Setbacks, Persistence, and Vindication
The road to Hubble’s launch was longer and more twisted than a DNA molecule. Originally scheduled for the early 1980s, the project faced delays, cost overruns, and the Challenger disaster in 1986, which grounded the entire shuttle program and threw all NASA missions into question.
Nancy Grace had retired from NASA in 1979, but she remained deeply involved in the project as a consultant and advocate. She watched from the sidelines as her life’s work faced its greatest challenges. There were moments when it seemed like the telescope might never fly, and the scientific community began to wonder if the “Mother of Hubble” had given birth to an expensive white elephant.
Then came April 24, 1990. Space Shuttle Discovery lifted off carrying the Hubble Space Telescope, and Nancy Grace’s 30-year dream finally became reality. She was there at the launch, watching as her vision literally reached for the stars.
But the story doesn’t end with a triumphant launch aboard STS-31,
Remember, this is space exploration we’re talking about, where Murphy’s Law has a graduate degree in astrophysics.
Within weeks of Hubble becoming operational, scientists realized there was a problem with the main mirror. It had been polished to the wrong shape by a minuscule amount—about 1/50th the width of a human hair—but in space, minuscule matters.
The images coming back from Hubble were blurry. The media had a field day. Headlines screamed about NASA’s “$1.5 billion blunder” and “the telescope that couldn’t see straight.” For Nancy Grace, who had spent decades defending the project, it must have felt like watching your child stumble on graduation day in front of the entire world.
But here’s where Nancy Grace’s character truly shone. Instead of defending the flawed telescope or making excuses, she supported NASA’s decision to fix it.
The 1993 servicing mission was one of the most complex spacewalks ever attempted, essentially performing eye surgery on a patient orbiting at 17,500 miles per hour. When the first corrected images came back from Hubble, they were nothing short of spectacular.
The Eagle Nebula’s ‘pillars of creation’ is still an iconic Hubble image, the deep field and ultra and extreme deep field images showing galaxies billions of light-years away, the detailed views of planets in our own solar system—Hubble was finally delivering on Nancy Grace’s promises … and then some.
Chapter 6: The Hubble Legacy and Beyond
Over the next three decades, Hubble has revolutionized our understanding of the universe in ways that even Nancy Grace had barely dared to hope.
I looked on various online catalogues and found over 260,000 astronomy papers referencing data from the Hubble Space telescope … an astonishing science legacy
Hubble helped determine the age of the universe (13.8 billion years, give or take a few cosmic seconds).
It provided evidence for dark energy, the mysterious force causing the universe’s expansion to accelerate.
It captured images of unprecedented beauty and scientific value, from the birth of stars to the death of galaxies.
But perhaps most importantly, Hubble changed how the public views space exploration. Those stunning images weren’t just scientific data—they were works of art that made the cosmos accessible to everyone.
Nancy Grace had always believed that astronomy belonged to all humanity, not just to scientists in white coats, and Hubble delivered that vision in high definition. Nancy Grace remained active in the astronomical community well into her 80s. She served on advisory boards, mentored young scientists, and continued to advocate for space-based astronomy.
She was particularly passionate about encouraging women to pursue careers in science, drawing from her own experiences of overcoming barriers that seem almost absurd in retrospect.
Some of those barriers still exist today. There is still work to be done
In 2017, NASA honored Nancy Grace by naming their next-generation space telescope after her.
The Nancy Grace Roman Space Telescope is on track for completion by fall 2026 and launch no later than May 2027 and will search for exoplanets and study dark energy.
This is a fitting tribute to a woman who spent her career pushing the boundaries of what’s possible.
Nancy Grace passed away on December 25, 2018, at age 93. She lived long enough to see Hubble’s 28th year of operation and to know that her legacy would continue with the telescope bearing her name.
Chapter 7: The Woman Behind the Telescope
Beyond her professional achievements, Nancy Grace Roman was known for her wit, her directness, and her ability to cut through bureaucratic nonsense with surgical precision.
Her NASA Colleagues remember her as someone who could explain complex astrophysics to a congressman and then turn around and tell a Nobel laureate why their pet theory was wrong—all with the same calm, matter-of-fact demeanor.
She had a particular talent for making astronomy accessible. In interviews, she would use analogies that made sense to ordinary people.
When explaining why space telescopes were better than ground-based ones, she’d compare it to the difference between looking at fish from above the water versus swimming down to see them clearly. Nancy Grace never married or had children, a choice that was often questioned in her era.
Her response was typically direct: she had chosen to dedicate her life to science, and she had no regrets about that decision. She is reported to have once said, “I think the universe has been my baby, and it’s been very fulfilling.”
Her sense of humor was legendary. When asked about being called the “Mother of Hubble,” she would joke that she preferred “the grandmother of Hubble” because “mothers get blamed for everything their children do wrong, but grandmothers get credit for the good stuff.”
She was also remarkably prescient about the future of astronomy. In interviews from the 1970s and 1980s, she predicted that space telescopes would eventually discover thousands of exoplanets, reveal the detailed structure of distant galaxies, and provide insights into the fundamental nature of the universe.
At the time, these seemed like science fiction fantasies.
Today, they’re just every Tuesday’s astronomical news.
Chapter 8: Lessons from the Mother of Hubble
Nancy Grace Roman’s story offers several important lessons for anyone pursuing ambitious goals, whether in science or any other field.
First, persistence matters more than perfection. Nancy Grace faced setbacks, budget cuts, technical problems, and institutional resistance that would have discouraged many people.
But she kept pushing forward, adapting her approach while never losing sight of her ultimate goal.
Second, vision without politics is just daydreaming.
Nancy Grace understood that great scientific projects require more than just great science—they need public support, political backing, and institutional commitment.
She was willing to spend years in conference rooms and congressional hearings because she knew that’s where her telescope would ultimately be funded or killed.
Third, failure is often just success delayed or in disguise.
The early problems with Hubble’s mirror could have ended the project’s scientific credibility. Instead, they led to one of NASA’s greatest technical achievements and demonstrated that complex problems in space could be solved with ingenuity and determination.
Fourth, mentorship matters. Throughout her career, Nancy Grace made time to encourage other women entering astronomy. She understood that breaking barriers is only meaningful if you help others follow in your path.
Finally, timing is everything, but patience is eternal. Nancy Grace began advocating for a large space telescope in the 1960s, but Hubble didn’t launch until 30 years later in 1990.
She could have given up during any of the intervening decades, but she understood that some goals are worth waiting for—and fighting for.
Conclusion:
A Universe of Gratitude As we wrap up our journey through Nancy Grace Roman’s remarkable life, it’s worth taking a moment to consider what the universe might look like today if she had listened to that high school guidance counselor who suggested she become a teacher instead of an astronomer. In the end she did become a teacher who taught us to look up and dream … bur she was first and foremost a fearsome astronomer, who fought for the chance to really see our universe as it is.
We might never have seen the Pillars of Creation in all their ethereal beauty.
We might not know that the universe is 13.8 billion years old, or that it’s filled with dark energy pushing galaxies apart at an accelerating rate.
We might never have discovered that supermassive black holes lurk at the centers of most galaxies, or that star formation is a process of breathtaking complexity and beauty.
More importantly, we might not have learned that we live in a universe far stranger, more beautiful, and more inspiring than our deity-inventing ancestors ever imagined.
Nancy Grace Roman gave us new eyes to see the cosmos, and in doing so, she changed our understanding of our place within it.
Today, when you see a stunning image from Hubble—whether it’s a colorful nebula, a distant galaxy, or a detailed view of a planet in our solar system—remember Nancy Grace Roman.
Remember that girl who organized astronomy clubs in her backyard, the woman who fought bureaucrats and budget committees, and the scientist who never stopped believing that humanity deserved to see the universe in all its glory.
The next time you look up at the night sky, take a moment to appreciate not just the stars, but the remarkable woman who made it possible for us to see them more clearly than ever before.
Nancy Grace Roman truly was the Mother of Hubble,
In an age when we often focus on what divides us, Nancy Grace’s legacy reminds us of what unites us: our shared wonder at the universe and our collective desire to understand our place within it. That’s not just good science—that’s good humanity.
So that’s our show for today. Nancy Grace Roman’s story reminds us that the most important discoveries often come from the most persistent dreamers.
Next time on Astrophiz, we’ll be looking at discoveries that Nancy Grace would have loved to have seen.
Until then, keep looking up, keep asking questions, and remember—sometimes the most important thing you can do is refuse to take no for an answer. I’m your host, Brendan, sighing off, and this has been Astrophiz.
Thanks for listening, and we’ll see you among the stars.
The Astronomy Astrophiz Podcasts 